Delivered-To: igsreport@igscb.jpl.nasa.gov
Message-ID: <5ACEEE96F4F9D41190790002A528B51E07097740@S0-OTT-X11.NRCan.gc.ca>
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=22Ferland=2C_R=E9mi=22?= <RFerland@NRCan.gc.ca>
To: "'igsreport@igscb.jpl.nasa.gov'" <igsreport@igscb.jpl.nasa.gov>
Cc: "'gendt@gfz-potsdam.de'" <gendt@gfz-potsdam.de>,
	"'nisn@gfz-potsdam.de'" <nisn@gfz-potsdam.de>
Subject: [IGSREPORT-12125] RE: [IGSREPORT-12123] Wk 1303 IGS SINEX Combination
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 09:49:41 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: owner-igsreport
Precedence: bulk

******************************************************************************
IGS Electronic Report   10 Jan 06:51:28 PST 2005      Message Number 12125
******************************************************************************

Author:  R. Ferland

	Sorry for the IGSREPORT-12123 report.
It was the report of a preliminary solution for GPS week 1303
not intended for distribution.

This preliminary solution seems to confirm earlier reports
by Gerd (using PPP) that some stations should not be used
anymore (more with the final).

Please disregards previous report,

Best Regards,
Remi,