Delivered-To: igs-dcwg@igscb.jpl.nasa.gov Subject: [IGS-DCWG-32] Re: [IGS-DCWG-30] Re: [IGS-DCWG-27] Any DCs accepting .gz RINEX? From: Dave Stowers To: igs-dcwg@igscb.jpl.nasa.gov In-Reply-To: <419D11D1.7080809@jpl.nasa.gov> References: <419D11D1.7080809@jpl.nasa.gov> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1100814518.19458.5.camel@anathema.jpl.nasa.gov> Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 13:48:39 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-igs-dcwg Precedence: bulk ****************************************************************************** IGS-DCWG Mail 18 Nov 14:02:23 PST 2004 Message Number 32 ****************************************************************************** Author: Dave Stowers On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 13:19, Angelyn W. Moore wrote: > ****************************************************************************** > IGS-DCWG Mail 18 Nov 13:19:14 PST 2004 Message Number 30 > ****************************************************************************** > > Author: Angelyn Moore > > Thanks for the info so far... > I guess there are really three questions then: > > 1. Can anyone accept .gz as input from a station/ODC? (looks like yes) yep. > 2. Should we consider switching to offering new data in .gz starting > at some well-announced future point in time? Consider? Sure. Minor implications for CRZ2RNX-like scripts... > 3. Should we consider changing all the historical archives > to .gz? no. > In my mind (2) does not necessarily imply (3) especially since > there are tools that can uncompress both styles, which makes it > not too difficult for a user to handle a set of old + new data > which is part .Z and part .gz. exactly. -dave