Delivered-To: igs-dcwg@igscb.jpl.nasa.gov
Message-ID: <3EEE4099.EE7D6198@jpl.nasa.gov>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:11:37 -0700
From: Dave Stowers <dstowers@jpl.nasa.gov>
Reply-To: dstowers@jpl.nasa.gov
To: igs-dcwg@igscb.jpl.nasa.gov
Subject: [IGS-DCWG-13] Resupplied data
Sender: owner-igs-dcwg
Precedence: bulk

******************************************************************************
IGS-DCWG Mail      16 Jun 15:11:41 PDT 2003      Message Number 13
******************************************************************************

Author: Dave Stowers


I should have sent this to the IGS-DCWG list a few weeks ago...
Most of it's been covered since (or various twists).

-dave

Dave Stowers wrote:
> 
> Hi Carey,
> 
> Seems like notification of Data Centers and the User Community of resubmitted
> data may be handled by a single process (e.g., IGSmail notification with
> cc to Data Center leads). Data resubmitted without notification
> should not be published. I suggest that the email notification list
> would be preferable to a web site. Perhaps an additional feature
> could be to archive previously submitted data to a lower directory
> level, and/or have a standard text file in each dir containing replaced
> filenames/sizes/(MD5?) and dates?
> 
> Don't know how something like this would interact with GSAC in terms
> of auto-notification...
> 
> Also, does there need to be a policy regarding when a replacement
> becomes "active", so that Analysis Centers are reviewing common
> data sets (or reprocessing in coordination w/ each other)?...don't
> know much about existing AC rules.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> -dave