Delivered-To: iglosmail@igscb.jpl.nasa.gov
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 16:06:22 +0200
From: Stefan Schaer <stefan.schaer@aiub.unibe.ch>
Subject: [IGLOSMAIL-1000] Re: [IGLOSMAIL-996] R06
In-reply-to: <406C2071.9030203@caaisn.leeds.ac.uk>
To: iglosmail <iglosmail@igscb.jpl.nasa.gov>
Message-id: <406D735E.1080305@aiub.unibe.ch>
Organization: Astronomical Institute, University of Berne
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4)
 Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
References: <406C2071.9030203@caaisn.leeds.ac.uk>
Sender: owner-iglosmail
Precedence: bulk

******************************************************************************
IGLOS Electronic Mail      02 Apr 06:06:27 PST 2004   Message Number 1000
******************************************************************************

Author: Stefan Schaer

 > ... which means do not use the satellite.

Disregarding of such satellites actually does make sense for
stand-alone positioning, but not for post-processing of permanent
receiver arrays as carried out within the IGS. At CODE, we use to
generate precise GNSS orbits independent of whether a satellite is
marked unusable, brand new, or being repositioned.

Stefan

